First taught by Saint Ambrose in the fourth century, the title of “Mother of the Church” for the Virgin Mary was proclaimed by [Saint] Paul VI on November 21, 1964, at the conclusion of the Second Vatican Council’s third session. Since that time a devotional memorial to Mary has appeared on a number of proper religious, diocesan, and national calendars. To better focus the Church’s attention on the maternal care of the Blessed Mother for the disciples of Christ throughout the ages, Pope Francis has chosen to inscribe this memorial for the universal Church.
Robert Cardinal Sarah, Prefect of the Congregation, provided some spiritual reflections in a commentary accompanying the decree: “The water and blood which flowed from the heart of Christ on the Cross as a sign of the totality of his redemptive offering, continue to give life to the Church sacramentally through Baptism and the Eucharist. In this wonderful communion between the Redeemer and the redeemed, which always needs to be nourished, Blessed Mary has her maternal mission to carry out.” He also recounted the existing liturgical history of the celebration of Mary, Mother of the Church. In preparation for the Jubilee Year of 1975, her Votive Mass was approved in 1973 and inserted into the Missale Romanum, editio typica altera. Saint John Paul II added “Mother of the Church” to the Litany of Loreto in 1980, and during the Marian Year of 1987, a new Collection of Masses of the Blessed Virgin Mary was issued, including two additional formularies for the Virgin Mary as “Image and Mother of the Church.” Cardinal Sarah’s commentary reminds the followers of Christ that “if we want to grow and to be filled with the love of God, it is necessary to plant our life firmly on three great realities: the Cross, the Eucharist, and the Mother of God. These are three mysteries that God gave to the world in order to structure, fructify, and sanctify our interior life and lead us to Jesus.”
If there are only two sides – and there are only two sides – in opposition to one another [as in good vs. evil, light vs. dark, right vs. wrong, love/beauty vs. hate/abomination, true vs. false, sweet vs. bitter, life vs. death, freedom vs. slavery, salvation vs. damnation] then if they agree on a thing, that thing MUST be true.
The two sides aforementioned say God exists[i], therefore, that God exists, is, TRUE.
The two sides in their respective worship allow for an only all-male priesthood.
RECENT CATHOLIC CHURCH POPES
code
The following are all ILLUMINATI PRIESTS [ – MALE Priests]
The Supreme, Self-existent, Eternal, All-wise, All-powerful, Infinitely Good, Pitying, Beneficent, and Merciful Creator and Preserver of the Universe was the same, by whatever name he was called, to the intellectual and enlightened men of all nations.
The Guilt of Mankind
18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and wickedness of men who by their wickedness suppress the truth. 19 For what can be known about God is plain to them, because God has shown it to them. 20 Ever since the creation of the world his invisible nature, namely, his eternal power and deity, has been clearly perceived in the things that have been made. So they are without excuse; 21 for although they knew God they did not honor him as God or give thanks to him, but they became futile in their thinking and their senseless minds were darkened.
Counts I., II., and VII. are heretical propositions opposed to formal [De fide] dogmas, with VII. opposed to at least 8 formal dogmas.
Counts III., IV., V., and VI. are false propositions contrary to dogmatic facts.
It has been observed that Count VII. is indicative of a repudiation of the entire Christian religion and of the Catholic Faith.
Concluding,
Woe to those who call evil good and good evil
Woe to those who call evil good
and good evil,
who put darkness for light
and light for darkness,
who put bitter for sweet
and sweet for bitter!
– Isaiah 5:20 (RSVCE)
In addition to the heretical and apostate charges, all of the counts are an inversion of or opposed to some Catholic truth or teaching: for example, obedience to God is called a sin when it is disobedience to God that IS a sin.
Let the Bishops of the Catholic Church do what is incumbent upon them and thoroughly investigate these charges because the one accused is none other than Pope Francis, the current Pope of the Catholic Church, and if found guilty, not only would he be a heretic and an apostate, he would also be a false teacher/prophet.
“Freedom is a right of every person: each individual enjoys the freedom of belief, thought, expression and action. The pluralism and the diversity of religions, colour, sex, race and language are willed by God in His wisdom, through which He created human beings. This divine wisdom is the source from which the right to freedom of belief and the freedom to be different derives. Therefore, the fact that people are forced to adhere to a certain religion or culture must be rejected, as too the imposition of a cultural way of life that others do not accept[.]”
– [Pope] Francis > Travels > 2019 > Apostolic Voyages outside Italy [TO THE UNITED ARAB EMIRATES (3-5 FEBRUARY 2019)] > A DOCUMENT ON HUMAN FRATERNITY FOR WORLD PEACE AND LIVING TOGETHER
(Please note that in this document, there is no mention of “Jesus” or “Christ”.)
Therefore, restating Count VII. as:
God in his Son [Wisdom] not only permits, but positively wills, the pluralism and diversity of religions, both Christian and non-Christian.
Now,
CCC 108 Still, the Christian faith is not a “religion of the book.” Christianity is the religion of the “Word” of God, a word which is “not a written and mute word, but the Word is incarnate and living”. If the Scriptures are not to remain a dead letter, Christ, the eternal Word of the living God, must, through the Holy Spirit, “open [our] minds to understand the Scriptures.”
Therefore, proposition in Count VII. opposes at least the following De fide dogmas in the FUNDAMENTALS OF CATHOLIC DOGMA:
1) The Church was founded by the God-Man Jesus Christ. [De fide.]
2) Christ founded the Church in order to continue His work of redemption for all time. [De fide.]
3) Christ founded the Church. [De fide.]
4) Christ is the Head of the Church. [De fide.]
5) The Church founded by Christ is unique and one. [De fide.]
6) The Church founded by Christ is catholic. [De fide.]
7) The Church founded by Christ is apostolic. [De fide.]
8) Membership of the Church is necessary for all men for salvation. [De fide.]
The last paragraph of the explanation of this dogma is as follows:
“As against the reproach of intolerance a distintion must be made between dogmatic and civil tolerance. The Church rejects the dogmatic tolerance which would concede the same power of justification and the same value to all religions or to all Christian confessions (Indifferentism), for there is only one truth. But the Church recognises the propriety of civil tolerance, by preaching the commandment of neighbourly charity towards all men, even those in error. Cf. the prayers of the Liturgy on Good Friday.” (My emphasis)
Therefore, Count VII. is a heretical proposition (propositio haeretica) or a proposition opposed to the above formal dogmas.
Observation
How is holding the proposition in Count VII. not only heretical but also apostate?
This reading seems to overturn the doctrine of the Gospel. In fact, the Ark which Noah by divine command built before the Flood, as a refuge for himself, his family and all animal species (Gen. 6:13-22), is presented by St. Paul as a refuge of salvation for believers and a sign of perdition for the world (Heb. 11:7). Catholic Tradition has therefore always seen in Noah’s Ark the symbol of the Church, outside of which there is no salvation (cf. S. Ambrose, De Noe et Arca, 6. 9, in Migne, Patrologia Latina, vol. 14, coll. 368-374, and Hugo von Hurter, De arca Noe Ecclesiae typo Patrum sententiae, dans Sanctorum Patrum opuscula selecta, III, Innsbruck 1868, pp. 217-233).
– Pope seems to ‘overturn’ Gospel in statement with Grand Imam: Church historian by Diane Montagna | LifeSiteNews, Wed Feb 6, 2019 – 2:16 pm EST
Examining Count VI. of VII w/Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma
As to Count VI.
VI. Moral principles and moral truths contained in divine revelation and in the natural law do not include negative prohibitions that absolutely forbid particular kinds of action, inasmuch as these are always gravely unlawful on account of their object.
– Open Letter to Bishops of the Catholic Church, Easter Week, 2019
In FUNDAMENTALS OF CATHOLIC DOGMA, there are no De fide dogmas that are relevant to this count.
Now [if the proposition has been understood correctly],
– One may never do evil so that good may result from it;
[…]
Therefore, Count VI. is a false proposition (propositio falsa), a proposition contrary to a dogmatic fact which in this case is ‘there are acts which are evil in themselves regardless of their intended outcome’.
In FUNDAMENTALS OF CATHOLIC DOGMA, there are no De fide dogmas that are relevant to this count.
Now,
CCC 2349 “People should cultivate [chastity] in the way that is suited to their state of life. Some profess virginity or consecrated celibacy which enables them to give themselves to God alone with an undivided heart in a remarkable manner. Others live in the way prescribed for all by the moral law, whether they are married or single.” Married people are called to live conjugal chastity; others practice chastity in continence:
There are three forms of the virtue of chastity: the first is that of spouses, the second that of widows, and the third that of virgins. We do not praise any one of them to the exclusion of the others. . . . This is what makes for the richness of the discipline of the Church.
Therefore, Count V. is a false proposition (propositio falsa), a proposition contrary to a dogmatic fact which in this case is ‘others [other than married couples] practice chastity in continence’.
Examining Count IV. w/Fundamentals of Catholic Dogma
As to Count IV.
IV. Conscience can truly and rightly judge that sexual acts between persons who have contracted a civil marriage with each other, although one or both of them is sacramentally married to another person, can sometimes be morally right, or requested or even commanded by God.
– Open Letter to Bishops of the Catholic Church, Easter Week, 2019
In FUNDAMENTALS OF CATHOLIC DOGMA | VII. THE SACRAMENT OF MATRIMONY, the couple De fide dogmas[i] are not relevant to this count.
Now,
What is adultery?
CCC 2380 Adultery refers to marital infidelity. When two partners, of whom at least one is married to another party, have sexual relations – even transient ones – they commit adultery. Christ condemns even adultery of mere desire. The sixth commandment and the New Testament forbid adultery absolutely. The prophets denounce the gravity of adultery; they see it as an image of the sin of idolatry.
With this definition, Count IV can, therefore, read:
IV. Conscience can truly and rightly judge that [adultery], can sometimes be morally right, or requested or even commanded by God.
Conscience can truly judge right what is wrong?!
Therefore, Count IV. is a proposition that is nonsensical, contradictory, erroneous and wrong [as opposed to right], false [as opposed to true], and an intrinsic impossibility.
Show on Earth conceals/reveals Obama’s sex at birth
– MALE Priests]
-King© ‘s Secret
AOTU
